Agroecology, Biodiversity, Land use

Viele landwirtschaftliche Subventionen in der Schweiz wirken sich negativ auf die Biodiversität aus

Leave a comment

Um den Biodiversitätsverlust zu bremsen, finanzieren der Bund und die Kantone verschiedenen biodiversitätsfördernde Massnahmen. Mit einem Vielfachen dieser Beträge werden Aktivitäten finanziert, die Lebensräume und Arten direkt oder indirekt schädigen. Insgesamt 207 Subventionen in verschienden Bereichen sind es die ganz, teilweise oder indirekt Biodiversität schädigen. Zu dieser Schlussfolgerung kommt eine Untersuchung zusammen mit WSL und in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Forum Biodiversität, aus welcher ein Faktenblatt des SCNAT hervorgegangen ist (Gubler et al., 2020).

Darin werden im Bereich der Landwirtschaft einige Verbesserungen der Subventionspraxis vorgeschlagen, um biodiversitätsschädigende Subventionen bis 2020 zu beseitigen, schrittweise abzubauen oder umzugestalten.

Continue reading Viele landwirtschaftliche Subventionen in der Schweiz wirken sich negativ auf die Biodiversität aus →
Agroecology, Pesticides

Wie können wir die politischen Rahmenbedingungen für die Reduzierung des Pestizideinsatzes verbessern?

Leave a comment

Ein sehr umfassender Review-Artikel ist durch PSC Mitglieder zum Thema Pestizidreduzierung veröffentlicht worden: Pathways for advancing pesticide policies (Möhring et al., 2020). Die Autoren analysiseren die politischen Massnahmen, um weniger Pestizide zu verwenden und gleichzeitig die Produktion von Nahrungsmitteln sicherzustellen.

Continue reading Wie können wir die politischen Rahmenbedingungen für die Reduzierung des Pestizideinsatzes verbessern? →
Biodiversity, Land use

Principles for participation in competing demands for land use

Leave a comment

Global demand for agricultural products is competing with scarce land resources and environmental protection especially biodiversity protection and the increasing thread of shortages of water and nutrients. How can we ensure biodiversity and ecosystem protection in fragile habitats if we struggle to satisfy the demand of the world population for food, energy and housing?

Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses (Sayer et al., 2013) can help to guide the process of decision-making in the landscape context. These principles emphasize that we will need a people-centred approach applied at landscape scales and a focus on multifunctional landscapes. The principles in short:

Continue reading Principles for participation in competing demands for land use →
Courses

Open places: Research with biological material from abroad – International regulations and due diligence in research

Leave a comment

The course will be held online. Registration (closes soon): https://ethz.ch/services/en/service/courses-continuing-education.html—> Choose Plant Sciences to view and register for all currently offered PSC courses.

5 & 6 November 2020

Do you work with biological material from abroad? Do you know, how to correctly proceed with access and benefit sharing, material transferagreements and other procedures?

Continue reading Open places: Research with biological material from abroad – International regulations and due diligence in research →
Biodiversity, PSC Science-Policy Fellowship

Maintaining Plant Biodiversity in Cities

Leave a comment

Using Urban Design for a Better Green Infrastructure in Zurich

By Kevin Vega

What evidence was useful for policymaking?

Understanding the effects of urban design on plant species composition in cities is essential to maintaining biodiversity overall, promoting urban resilience in the face of climate change, and improving life quality for a city’s residents. Functional ecosystems can benefit pollinators, reduce urban flooding, and improve air quality –all while looking aesthetically pleasing.

Continue reading Maintaining Plant Biodiversity in Cities →
Calls, PSC Science-Policy Fellowship

CALL 3 FOR PHD APPLICATIONS – DEADLINE Dec 1, 2020

Leave a comment

Call 3 for PhD applications within the RESPONSE Doctoral Programme «to society and policy needs through plant, food and energy sciences»

RESPONSE DP is offering 8 early-stage researcher’s positions for 36 months (100%) at the interface of science and policy, as well as science and innovation at one of the three world-leading academic host organization – ETH Zurich and University of Zurich.

RESPONSE DP will train ESRs to reflect on their role as scientists in society, contributing with evidence to policymaking and to build capacities to address global challenges in the areas of sustainable food systems, sustainable energy systems and sustainable land use decisions.

For more information about RESPONSE, open positions and further steps (i.e. submit your application), have a look at:https://www.plantsciences.uzh.ch/en/research/fellowships/response.html

ETH Zurich and University of Zurich are dedicated to promoting the role of women in science, and, therefore, explicitly invites women to apply.

Novel Molecular Breeding Techniques

Pflanzenzüchtung – von klassischer Kreuzung bis Genom-Editierung

Leave a comment

Mitglieder des PSC haben ein Faktenblatt zusammen mit dem Forum Genforschung Schweiz publiziert, welches die Methoden einer interessierten Öffentlichkeit verständlich machen will:

Ein neues Faktenblatt der Akademien der Wissenschaften Schweiz gewährt Ihnen einen Überblick über vier verschiedene Verfahren in der Pflanzenzüchtung und legt dabei einen Schwerpunkt auf die Anwendung der Genom-Editierung. Das Faktenblatt wurde von einer Gruppe von Experten und Expertinnen unter der Leitung des Forums Genforschung verfasst und geprüft.

Das Faktenblatt ist in Deutsch und Französisch unter folgendem Link erhältlich: http://geneticresearch.scnat.ch/fs-plantbreeding 

U Grossniklaus, M Messmer, R Peter, J Romeis und B Studer (2020) Pflanzenzüchtung – von klassischer Kreuzung bis Genom-Editierung. Swiss Academies Factsheet 15 (3): 10.5281/zenodo.3696456

PSC Publications, Responsible Research and Innovation

Following up the summer school 2018: PSC published proceedings

Leave a comment

Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center: Proceedings of the PlantHUB Summer School 2018, Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in Plant Sciences.

Melanie Paschke (ed.). With contributions by: Manuela Dahinden, Gregory Grin, Melanie Paschke, Christine Rösch, Daan Schuurbiers, Foteini Zampati, Camilo Chiang, Franco Conci, Claudio Cropano, Florian Cueni, Seydina Issa Diop, Daniel Grogg, Manuel Nolte, Ina Schlathölter, Giacomo Potente and Maximilian Vogt.

DOWNLOAD

The laboratory is in many ways still a protected space, in which (especially young) researchers are effectively shielded from outside pressures by their lab directors (Rip, 2003). The challenge for educational programs that aim to raise the level of attention to RRI issues is, therefore, to demonstrate the added value of social and ethical reflection for the researcher’s own work.

Continue reading Following up the summer school 2018: PSC published proceedings →
PSC Publications, Responsible Research and Innovation

PSC Proceedings: Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI)

Leave a comment

Following up the summer school 2018 the PSC published proceedings:

Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center: Proceedings of the PlantHUB Summer School 2018, Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in Plant Sciences.

Melanie Paschke (ed.). With contributions by: Manuela Dahinden, Gregory Grin, Melanie Paschke, Christine Rösch, Daan Schuurbiers, Foteini Zampati, Camilo Chiang, Franco Conci, Claudio Cropano, Florian Cueni, Seydina Issa Diop, Daniel Grogg, Manuel Nolte, Ina Schlathölter, Giacomo Potente and Maximilian Vogt.

DOWNLOAD

Social transformation through innovation and research is a key element in the discussion as to how the global community can overcome its complex problems related to environmental and economic constraints in a resource-limited world. Innovation conflicts arise when transformation is mainly technology-driven and does not take up ethical, legal and social issues. In response, scientists are today being asked to play a role in the science-in society dialogue.

The laboratory is in many ways still a protected space, in which (especially young) researchers are effectively shielded from outside pressures by their lab directors (Rip, 2003). The challenge for educational programs that aim to raise the level of attention to RRI issues is, therefore, to demonstrate the added value of social and ethical reflection for the researcher’s own work.

Continue reading PSC Proceedings: Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) →
Biodiversity

How can biodiversity-ecosystem function research (BEF) be used to inform ecosystem managers and policy-makers?

Leave a comment

Ecosystem researchers currently do different types of BEF research. How can these studies be used in policymaking? A recent analysis with involvement of Prof. Nina Buchmann from ETH Zurich and member of PSC came up with recommendations:

Continue reading How can biodiversity-ecosystem function research (BEF) be used to inform ecosystem managers and policy-makers? →