{"id":2398,"date":"2011-02-19T22:42:40","date_gmt":"2011-02-19T20:42:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wpethzprd.ethz.ch\/kowalski\/?p=2398"},"modified":"2024-02-20T13:40:37","modified_gmt":"2024-02-20T11:40:37","slug":"representation-theory-course","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/kowalski\/2011\/02\/19\/representation-theory-course\/","title":{"rendered":"Representation theory course"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Spring semester at ETH is starting next week, and I will be teaching an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.math.ethz.ch\/education\/bachelor\/lectures\/fs2011\/math\/RT\">introductory course on representation theory<\/a> (for third-year and later students).  I am looking forward to it, since this is the first time I teach a class identified as &#8220;algebra&#8221; (except for linear algebra, of course). <\/p>\n<p>My lecture notes will be available as I prepare them (the first chapter will be ready soon, at least in draft form)  and it will be seen that (partly because of my own bias) I think of a representation of a group as a homomorphism $latex G\\rightarrow \\mathrm{GL}(E)$, and not as modules over the group algebra. I certainly intend to mention the latter approach at some point (indeed, I have in preparation a long &#8220;Variants&#8221; chapter, where I mention also, e.g., topological representations, unitary representations, permutation representations, projective representations, Lie algebra representations, etc, with basic examples), but I find it useful to go through the elementary theory of representations completely &#8220;by hand&#8221;, for a course at this level. In some sense, this is because this is what I can do best, with my own knowledge; but also, going through these basic facts purely with the tools and language of representations-as-homomorphisms does provide excellent opportunities to start seeing various ways of using representation theory (I will for instance prove Burnside&#8217;s irreducibility criterion and the linear independence of matrix coefficients using  <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/kowalski\/2010\/09\/08\/reading-burnside-and-thanking-noether\/\">my understanding<\/a> of Burnside&#8217;s original arguments). And I do intend to use this course to introduce some functorial language to the students, and I feel that abstract nonsense will be quite appealing after trying to make sense of the confusion that may arise from proving the transitivity formula for induction strictly using the &#8220;subset of functions on the group&#8221; model for induced representations&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s a question about the module-over-the-group-algebra approach: what is the first (or simplest, or most fundamental) argument where it is better? The one I can think of for the moment &#8212; after going through the first chapter of my notes &#8212; is that it seems to give the simplest way to argue that a semisimple representation always contains an irreducible subrepresentation. (And of course this is only relevant for infinite-dimensional representations, since otherwise one can argue using dimension.)<\/p>\n<p>[<b>Update<\/b> (23.2.2011): the first chapters are now <a href=\"http:\/\/www.math.ethz.ch\/~kowalski\/representation-theory-notes.pdf\">online<\/a>.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Spring semester at ETH is starting next week, and I will be teaching an introductory course on representation theory (for third-year and later students). I am looking forward to it, since this is the first time I teach a class identified as &#8220;algebra&#8221; (except for linear algebra, of course). My lecture notes will be &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/kowalski\/2011\/02\/19\/representation-theory-course\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Representation theory course<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":625,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[157,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2398","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-eth","category-blogroll"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/kowalski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2398","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/kowalski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/kowalski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/kowalski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/625"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/kowalski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2398"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/kowalski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2398\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/kowalski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2398"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/kowalski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2398"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/kowalski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2398"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}