{"id":371,"date":"2019-07-09T13:13:28","date_gmt":"2019-07-09T11:13:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wpethzprd.ethz.ch\/Science_and_Policy\/?p=371"},"modified":"2019-09-24T10:19:12","modified_gmt":"2019-09-24T08:19:12","slug":"whats-next-after-the-ecj-judgement-on-gene-editing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/Science_and_Policy\/2019\/07\/09\/whats-next-after-the-ecj-judgement-on-gene-editing\/","title":{"rendered":"What`s next after the ECJ judgement on gene editing?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe need a societal discourse in which the political and ethical dimensions of the research in question are explored. What sort of agricultural system do we want? How are the new technologies to be used?\u201c emphazised Prof. Matthias Mahlmann, lawyer and member of the Swiss Ethics Commission for Non-Human Biotechnology, at a recent panel discussion on genome editing at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tnam2019.ethz.ch\/\">www.tnam2019.ethz.ch<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The participants of the TNAM 2019 conference take a tri-national view on the main issues and potential consequences of the ruling of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on organisms obtained by mutagenesis. The PSC has summarized the discussions at: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.plantsciences.uzh.ch\/en\/outreach\/roundtable.html\">https:\/\/www.plantsciences.uzh.ch\/en\/outreach\/roundtable.html<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Invited guests were:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li><strong>Prof.\nHolger Puchta<\/strong>, Karlsruhe Institute\nof Technology, Germany<\/li><li><strong>Franziska\nSchwab<\/strong>, Small Farmers Association, Switzerland<\/li><li><strong>Prof. em.\nJean-Marc Neuhaus<\/strong>,&nbsp;\nInstitut de Biologie, Universit\u00e9 de Neuch\u00e2tel, Member of the Swiss Ethics\nCommission for Non-Human Biotechnology<\/li><li><strong>Prof.\nMatthias Mahlmann<\/strong>, Faculty\nof Law, University of Zurich, Member of the Swiss Ethics Commission for\nNon-Human Biotechnology<\/li><li><strong>Dr. Ortrun\nMittelsten Scheid<\/strong>, Gregor\nMendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology, Austria<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The panel discussion was organized by PlantHUB \u00d4\u00c7\u00c6 a European industrial doctorate program funded by the European Union\u2019s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under the Marie Sk\u253c\u00e9odowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 722338.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cWe need a societal discourse in which the political and ethical dimensions of the research in question are explored. What sort of agricultural system do we want? How are the new technologies to be used?\u201c emphazised Prof. Matthias Mahlmann, lawyer and member of the Swiss Ethics Commission for Non-Human Biotechnology, at a recent panel discussion &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/Science_and_Policy\/2019\/07\/09\/whats-next-after-the-ecj-judgement-on-gene-editing\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">What`s next after the ECJ judgement on gene editing?<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":45042,"featured_media":322,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-371","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-psc-events"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/Science_and_Policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/Science_and_Policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/Science_and_Policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/Science_and_Policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/45042"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/Science_and_Policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=371"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/Science_and_Policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/Science_and_Policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/322"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/Science_and_Policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=371"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/Science_and_Policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=371"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ethz.ch\/Science_and_Policy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=371"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}